How to bail the racists (part 2)

Here is a perfect example of my previous post.  Putting up a few pictures showing how the ethnic make up of the French soccer team has changed, then claiming that he is making no statement approving this change or disapproving it.  The changes to the soccer team are indicative of the changes to the nation as a whole.

Why does he do this?  Whats the point in posting the obvious?

Firstly, to draw people to his blog and create controversy.  The second, because he must know the kind of audience he has, is to again create discussion.  Due to his already stated position of 'neutrality', he can take any populist position.

Predictably, the 'respectable' conservatives largely see this as a positive! So the result of a left wing program for multiracialism in all Western nations is applauded by them!  Read the comments, they are politically correct to the core....

One comments seems to 'get it'.

Can I ask why it is racist to want to keep your own cultural identity and that can includes skin colour. 

If we talk about any race anywhere in the world especially if discussing indigenous peoples everyone screams about preserving their cultural and racial identity. Why can't we discuss the European or Anglo Saxon identity. Especially when considering that in many countries within the next 50 years in Europe the indigenous people will become minorities within their own countries. There is a European identity. The same people who scream racist would jump up and down on the spot if someone built a McDonalds in the middle of an indigenous reservation despite the fact that it would probably create job

Here is the crux of the matter.  It's considered 'racist' for any white person who explicelty opposes and government policy or ideological agenda which would result in their nation become a multiracial melting pot.  I hazard a guess that Andrew Bolt would lead the charge of anti-racist against anyone who said so.

Assembly Line Human believes that anyone who cheers or who thinks that an ideology which leads to any group of people being made a minority, or being assimilated out is pretty much supporting genocide.

Lets not mince with words here.  Anyone who says it would be great for Fijians to intermix with the Indians who are inhabiting their nation till they are all the 'one race' is essentially saying Fijians must go.

That goes with any European/Anglo nation.