How to bail the racists (part 2)

Here is a perfect example of my previous post.  Putting up a few pictures showing how the ethnic make up of the French soccer team has changed, then claiming that he is making no statement approving this change or disapproving it.  The changes to the soccer team are indicative of the changes to the nation as a whole.

Why does he do this?  Whats the point in posting the obvious?

Firstly, to draw people to his blog and create controversy.  The second, because he must know the kind of audience he has, is to again create discussion.  Due to his already stated position of 'neutrality', he can take any populist position.

Predictably, the 'respectable' conservatives largely see this as a positive! So the result of a left wing program for multiracialism in all Western nations is applauded by them!  Read the comments, they are politically correct to the core....

One comments seems to 'get it'.

Can I ask why it is racist to want to keep your own cultural identity and that can includes skin colour. 

If we talk about any race anywhere in the world especially if discussing indigenous peoples everyone screams about preserving their cultural and racial identity. Why can't we discuss the European or Anglo Saxon identity. Especially when considering that in many countries within the next 50 years in Europe the indigenous people will become minorities within their own countries. There is a European identity. The same people who scream racist would jump up and down on the spot if someone built a McDonalds in the middle of an indigenous reservation despite the fact that it would probably create job

Here is the crux of the matter.  It's considered 'racist' for any white person who explicelty opposes and government policy or ideological agenda which would result in their nation become a multiracial melting pot.  I hazard a guess that Andrew Bolt would lead the charge of anti-racist against anyone who said so.

Assembly Line Human believes that anyone who cheers or who thinks that an ideology which leads to any group of people being made a minority, or being assimilated out is pretty much supporting genocide.

Lets not mince with words here.  Anyone who says it would be great for Fijians to intermix with the Indians who are inhabiting their nation till they are all the 'one race' is essentially saying Fijians must go.

That goes with any European/Anglo nation.

How to bait the racists

Conservatives are so easy to rip into.  They just make it soooo easy!

It's even easier than tearing the Politically Correct left apart.

"Respectable" Conservative wonderboy Andrew Bolt is defending Indians here against racists.

Andrew Bolt's modus operandi seems to be to bitch, whinge and moan about how immigrants 'dont assimilate', about how Serbs, Greeks etc still defend their ancestral roots and their ancestral nations and complaint about immigration (when Howards not increasing it, coz thats OK when the Liberal part does it) in general.  In short, to kind of rile up sentiment.  To keep active the kind of people who though Pauline Hanson was great.

Now what happens when someone starts to speak against it and take it that little bit further?  He is the first to smash them down.  To put the ideas out there, and then criticise anyone for acting on it.  This is the deadly trap.  Questioning multiculturalism and 'diversity' and modern day immigration policy leads to some uncomfortable revelations.  One must NOT explore the issue!  Thats the lesson that must be learned.

He is quite clearly liberal to the core.  A tool of Political Correctness.  A means of diverting sentiment away from the increasing multiracialisation of the Western world and directing it into an ineffective corner.  In this manner, the status quo remain unchallenged, unquestioned.  The question isn't the issues which he puts the spotlight on, it's the issues which surround the spotlight and remain in the darkness.  One must NOT explore the issue!  That the lesson that must be learned.  Stay within the spotlight and don't look further.

The more rational keep within it, and those who express their opinions in a crude and tactless manner, such as abusing minorities only serve to reinforce the status quo.

Quite simply, the idea that any nation or ethnic group (particularly those which are white) which maintains its ethnic/racial and cultural heritage has no place in 'conservative' ideology.  It's odd, because Political Correctness and Liberalism, two ideals conservative supposedly oppose, prescribe exactly the same ideal.

Conservatism is nothing more than puppet opposition to Liberalism.  They are the Washington Generals to the Harley Globetrotters.

The world is complex, and by categorising political thought into 'left' and 'right', one gives people only two prescribed options to choose from.  The decisions have been made and the allowable options have been presented, with disallowable ones taken out.  It is opinion poll politics, where if your response doesn't fit into one of the predefined responses you are an 'other'.

Remember, the earth as been COOLING since 1998

Heatwave of 46.4 degrees C bakes city

That city being my home city of Melbourne, Australia

As you read this, remember that the resident 'conservative' windbag Andrew Bolt has been repeating the line that the earth has been cooling since 1998, and that instead of worrying about the warming of the earth, we should be worrying about the earth cooling too much.

I'm not writing this to state he is absolutely, positively WRONG.  I'm writing this so you REMEMBER what "Global Warming Denialists" have said.  Because when record temperatures come again and again, they will simply stop talking and it will all go down the memory hole.  He and his acolytes will remain 'respectable conservatives', because everyone else will forget what they have said, and they will not bring it up either.